Transparent vehicle showing its battery, drive unit and vehicle electronics

Original resources · Version 1.0

Automotive Engineering Diagrams and Data

Three sourced reference packs for vehicle development, driving automation and in-vehicle networks. Download, analyse, teach or cite them.

3 packsFocused engineering references
6 SVGsEnglish and German diagrams
6 CSVsMachine-readable data
CC BY 4.0Reuse with attribution

What is in the EV-Global automotive engineering reference library? It contains original diagrams and CSV datasets that turn seven dense vehicle-engineering subjects into reusable references: automotive development from concept to SOP, SAE driving-automation responsibility from L0 to L5, CAN, LIN plus Automotive Ethernet in a zonal architecture, the three EV traction motor types, the engineering of the 2026 Tesla Roadster, the sensors a self-driving car sees with, and where the energy goes in a range-extender EV. Every pack states its sources, version and limitations.

These are editorial syntheses, not copied standards charts. The diagrams are designed for quick explanation. The CSV files expose the same logic for analysis, teaching and fact checking.

Reference 01

Automotive development process: concept to SOP

The map separates product design, manufacturing-process design, validation, PPAP, SOP and ramp-up. It also shows the point most summaries miss: APQP spans the evidence-building work, while PPAP is a customer approval process and SOP is a programme milestone. Exact gates, submission levels and timing vary by OEM and customer.

Automotive development process map from planning through PPAP, SOP and ramp-up

Reference 02

SAE autonomous driving levels L0-L5

The matrix answers three questions for every level: who controls the vehicle, who monitors the road, and who performs fallback. This makes the L2 to L3 boundary visible without treating the levels as a simple ladder of hardware capability.

SAE autonomous driving levels L0 to L5 responsibility matrix

Reference 03

CAN vs LIN vs Automotive Ethernet

The architecture diagram shows why the network debate has no single winner. Automotive Ethernet connects central compute and zones. CAN and CAN FD remain efficient for robust local control. LIN keeps simple actuators cheap. The companion data adds rates, access models, use cases and limits for six network variants.

CAN, LIN and Automotive Ethernet connected through zone controllers and central compute

Reference 04

EV motor types: permanent magnet, induction, externally excited

The cross-sections show the one decision that shapes an electric drive unit: how the rotor makes its magnetic field. Permanent magnets give the highest part-load efficiency at the price of rare earths and drag. A conductor cage costs least and freewheels. A powered coil keeps the field adjustable for motorway speeds without magnets. The companion data lists efficiency, drag, cost and example vehicles for all three.

Cross-sections of permanent-magnet, induction and externally excited EV motors inside the same three-phase stator

Reference 05

Tesla Roadster 2026: engineering map and force budget

A six-panel summary of the second-generation Roadster as Tesla's engineers described it on 15 and 16 October 2026: the 800-volt 4680 pack, the two-motor rear drive unit, the cold-gas thrusters, the suction fans, the active aero and the weight target, each with its status, plus a force budget that puts tyre grip, fan suction and thruster push on one scale. The companion dataset lines the Roadster's stated figures up against the Model S Plaid, Model Y, Rimac Nevera R, Lucid Air Sapphire, Taycan Turbo GT, Xiaomi SU7 Ultra and Yangwang U9, with a status column that separates claims and targets from measured cars.

Six-panel infographic of the 2026 Tesla Roadster engineering: battery, drive unit, thrusters, suction fans, active aero and packaging, plus a force-budget bar chart
SVGEditable vector diagramDownload the Roadster engineering mapBattery, drive unit, thrusters, fans and aero with the stated numbers.CSVMachine-readable datasetDownload the megawatt-EV comparisonPower, torque, 0-60, voltage, battery, charging, weight, wheelbase, price, status.

Read the full analysis in Tesla Roadster 2026: Specs, Thrusters and the Real Engineering, then the physics behind the drive unit in how an electric car motor works and why 800 volts matter.

Primary basis: Tesla's reveal livestream of 15 October 2026 and the engineer interviews with Hagerty and Top Gear on 16 October 2026, as reported by InsideEVs, Electrek, TechCrunch and EVXL; manufacturer specifications for the comparison cars. Figures labelled as claims or targets have not been independently measured.

Reference 06

Lidar, cameras and radar: the sensor matrix and the lidar price ladder

A seven-row matrix of the sensors a driver-assistance or robotaxi stack can carry, camera, conventional radar, 4D imaging radar, time-of-flight lidar, FMCW lidar, ultrasonic and thermal camera, with what each measures directly, its typical range and angular resolution, the conditions that defeat it and a 2026 unit-cost band, plus a price ladder for automotive lidar from the $75,000 roof unit of 2007 to the $200 Hesai ATX of 2025. The companion dataset holds the matrix values and the sensor suites of eleven vehicles and stacks, from Waymo's sixth-generation driver to Tesla's eight-camera Cybercab.

Matrix infographic of seven automotive sensor types with what each measures, typical range, resolution, weaknesses and 2026 unit cost, plus a lidar price ladder from 2007 to 2026
SVGEditable vector diagramDownload the sensor matrixSeven sensor types, five properties each, and the lidar price ladder.CSVMachine-readable datasetDownload the sensor datasetMatrix values plus cameras, lidars and radars per vehicle for eleven stacks.

Read the full analysis in Lidar vs Cameras vs Radar: How Self-Driving Cars See (2026), then how those streams are fused in how the AI in a self-driving car works and what each step of automation demands in the SAE levels guide.

Primary basis: supplier datasheets and filings (Hesai, RoboSense, Arbe, Continental, Mobileye, Valeo, Teledyne FLIR), manufacturer technical pages (Waymo, Mercedes-Benz, Nvidia, BYD, Huawei, Lucid), the VTT fog-chamber study and the LidarNews price history, as of October 2026. Cost bands marked as estimates are not published by suppliers.

Reference 07

BEV, EREV and PHEV: where 100 units of energy go

Five energy-flow strips that follow 100 units of grid energy or fuel to the wheels: a battery EV and a plugged-in range-extender EV deliver about 75 to 80, an EREV running on its generator 32 to 36, a parallel plug-in hybrid on its engine 24 to 34 and a petrol car 18 to 28, with the stage efficiencies behind each number, plus generator-versus-motor power for the Li Auto L9, AITO M9, Ram 1500 REV and BMW i3 REx. The companion dataset compares ten range-extender vehicles on battery, electric and total range, generator, system power, price, market and status as of October 2026.

Energy-flow infographic comparing a battery EV, a range-extender EV on the grid and on its generator, a parallel plug-in hybrid and a petrol car, with energy at the wheels per 100 units in and a generator-versus-motor power chart
SVGEditable vector diagramDownload the energy-flow diagramBEV, EREV and PHEV paths with stage efficiencies and the generator-to-motor ratio.CSVMachine-readable datasetDownload the EREV comparisonTen vehicles: battery, electric and total range, generator, power, price, market, status.

Read the full analysis in EREV Explained: How Range-Extender EVs Work, Who Builds Them, then the two machines in the chain: how an electric car motor works and how a car engine works.

Primary basis: manufacturer specifications (Li Auto, AITO, Xiaomi, Volkswagen, Leapmotor, Mazda, Stellantis, Scout Motors, Hyundai), generator efficiencies as published by Li Auto, Nissan and Horse Powertrain, the series-hybrid efficiency simulation in Engineering Transactions 73(3), 2025, and real-world consumption data from Transport & Environment and the ICCT. Stage efficiencies are indicative ranges, not test results.

Reuse and citation

Use the assets with attribution

The fourteen diagrams and fourteen datasets on this page are released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. You may share and adapt them, including commercially, if you credit EV-Global, link to this landing page and indicate whether you changed the material. Third-party standards and trademarks remain the property of their owners.

Suggested citation: EV-Global, “Automotive Engineering Reference Library,” version 1.0, 22 July 2026, https://ev-global.org/automotive-engineering/reference-library/.

Correction policy: send factual corrections through our contact page. Material changes receive a new version and updated date.